A technical SEO consultant who works like an engineer
I'm Nadia Mohamed — a freelance technical SEO consultant. Most consultants hand you a PDF and hope your dev team ships it. I do both halves: diagnose the architecture and implement the fix in code — rendering, structured data, Core Web Vitals, hreflang, and the GEO signals that earn AI citations. Recommendations that actually merge, not a backlog that never clears.
Why teams hire a consultant who implements
The common failure mode of technical SEO isn't diagnosis — it's execution. Good audits get written, handed to a dev team with other priorities, and quietly become a PDF nobody opens. Removing that hand-off is the entire point of this practice.
The fact she can both consult AND implement — and her ability to stay at the forefront of the rapid developments across SEO, AEO and GEO — makes her the perfect candidate for any company looking to build out its organic prowess.
What a technical SEO engagement covers
Strictly the architecture — the layer most teams can't get implemented even when they know what's wrong:
- Rendering & indexability What Googlebot actually receives on a JavaScript or headless stack — and closing the gap between the browser and the index.
- Structured data & entity signals Valid, eligible JSON-LD plus the Person/Organisation entity layer AI engines use to attribute content to you.
- Core Web Vitals The specific render-path bottlenecks behind the field data, fixed — not just flagged.
- International architecture Hreflang reciprocity at scale, locale routing, canonical strategy and equity-safe migrations.
- GEO & AI-citation readiness Whether ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews can extract and cite your pages — a structural fix, not a content one.
Ways in: the productised technical SEO audit, a deep-dive into how these audits work, or — if you're a software company — the SaaS-specific engagement.
See what's actually holding your site back
Start with a free health check on your priority page — a scored report with your top three fixes within 48 hours, no sales call. If the architecture needs deeper work, we scope a fixed-fee audit or a retainer from there.
Common questions
What does a technical SEO consultant do?
A technical SEO consultant diagnoses and fixes the architecture that decides whether a site can be crawled, indexed, rendered and cited — JavaScript rendering, canonical and hreflang strategy, structured data, Core Web Vitals, crawl budget, and AI-citation readiness. The distinguishing part of this practice is implementation: the same person who finds the problem writes the JSON-LD, executes the redirect map and merges the pull request, rather than handing a report to a separate dev team.
What is the difference between a technical SEO consultant and an agency?
An agency usually separates strategy from delivery across account managers, strategists and an engineering team, which adds hand-offs and translation loss between SEO requirements and dev tickets. A freelance technical SEO consultant is one senior point of contact who both diagnoses and implements — so fixes ship instead of waiting in a backlog. For teams that need architectural depth without an agency retainer, that directness is the whole value.
Do you actually implement the fixes or just recommend them?
Implement. The background is full-stack engineering — React/Next.js front ends, Python and PHP back ends, JSON-LD and server-side measurement — applied to SEO and GEO. Schema, migrations, redirect maps and dashboards ship as production infrastructure. Where your own engineers own the deploy, the deliverable is a workbook built so they can execute it row by row.
How much does a freelance technical SEO consultant cost?
Work is scoped to the engagement — a fixed-fee technical SEO audit, or a retainer for ongoing technical and GEO work, capped at three retainer clients a quarter so the depth stays real. The lowest-friction start is the free health check: a scored read on your priority page with the top three fixes in 48 hours, no sales call.
Can you work alongside our in-house team?
Yes, and it is often the strongest setup. Your team knows the product, history and priorities; this brings the structural and engineering depth they are frequently blocked from getting implemented. The audit workbook becomes the artefact they use to push technical work through.